Curse

Blessed Winds · Nov 04, 2007, 05:24 AM // 05:24

Eh, both content were better than Factions PvE =P

HawkofStorms · Nov 04, 2007, 05:27 AM // 05:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryant Again

Interesting that 40% of the votes are for SF.....

I think a lot of people aren't voting for SF so much as they are voting against GW:EN.

Bryant Again · Nov 04, 2007, 05:32 AM // 05:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkofStorms

I think a lot of people aren't voting for SF so much as they are voting against GW:EN.

Sad, ain't it?

Zeek Aran · Nov 04, 2007, 05:41 AM // 05:41

SF is too small. And I didn't like vanquishing Grenth's Footprint.

Spike · Nov 04, 2007, 05:50 AM // 05:50

I would have to go with SF as I spent SO much more time there then I have in gwen.

- Tain - · Nov 04, 2007, 06:02 AM // 06:02

SF = Free, and in its time was a new, challenging area which also introduced greens.

GWEN = $40, short (compared to what I expected for the price), nothing challenging, nothing much new. Nice views, though..

FireFox · Nov 04, 2007, 06:46 AM // 06:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryant Again

Sad, ain't it?

forum trolling is fun

CyberMesh0 · Nov 04, 2007, 02:07 PM // 14:07

This isn't even a valid question, we're comparing an apple and an orange- because one was "free" and one wasn't. Never mind the 10 heroes that came with EotN. As far as difficulty there are plenty of areas in EotN that compare to (and even surpass) Sorrow's. As far as length, Sorrow's was much shorter :-p

If you couldn't tell, I voted for EotN.

Viruzzz · Nov 04, 2007, 02:21 PM // 14:21

if its just "best" then I say EotN.
But I don't think its a fair comparison, its like comparing the PS2 with the PS3, its a later generation of expansion, it should be better, and on top of that it costs money this time, SF was free(as long as you had the game).

I voted SF, the enjoyment i got form that back when it was released was better than what i have gotten form EotN

lacasner · Nov 04, 2007, 02:25 PM // 14:25

Sf was way more fun, no comparison

Vinraith · Nov 04, 2007, 03:12 PM // 15:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberNigma

...

You semantic nitpick has been corrected in my post.

Prof Of Black · Nov 04, 2007, 03:20 PM // 15:20

I haven't played SF that much, since I'm only playing GW for 1 year now.

So I voted GW:EN. I kinda liked it.

~Prof.

Saraphim · Nov 04, 2007, 03:25 PM // 15:25

EotN.

So what if SF was free? It's not much more than a very large repeatable mission map.

Sub Frost · Nov 04, 2007, 03:31 PM // 15:31

Considering that a large number of ppl that enjoyed SF, quited GW long time before EoTN came out, the number's on this poll will have no surprise.

You can't see me · Nov 04, 2007, 03:31 PM // 15:31

I've been through both SF and GW:EN many many times. Without question, GW:EN added so much more to the game, and is clearly the better of the two, free or not.

Longasc · Nov 04, 2007, 03:35 PM // 15:35

I do not think you can compare that.

1 area + 1 dungeon + the introduction of green items, FREE

vs

some 15-18 (?) areas and 18 (2 of them super tiny) dungeons plus new heroes and skins and whatever, X USD or EUR.

SF wins the bang for the buck price... and the dungeon is a lot more original than all the recycled GWEN dungeons.

I still vote for GW:EN.

Gun Pierson · Nov 04, 2007, 03:41 PM // 15:41

I smell a troll poll in favor of Gwen hate.

You can't compare the two, not by content, not by price. The question should be: If Anet had to remove one of the two from the server, which one would you like to stay? You would be an idiot if you'll vote for SF in that case.

Hobbs · Nov 04, 2007, 03:42 PM // 15:42

Sure, I farmed the hell out of SF and made a fair amount of money doing it, but it wasn't amazingly fun. I found doing Slavers' for the first time funner than doing SF for the first time and EoTN doesn't just include Slavers' it has much more to offer, like the 5 new maxable titles which will shortly be getting me to 20 max titles. I voted EoTN.

Croco Clouds · Nov 04, 2007, 03:49 PM // 15:49

yea, I want my 40$ back too, I don't go to GW:EN area anymore...bored of dungeons

Frozy · Nov 04, 2007, 03:58 PM // 15:58

SF obviously has much less content than EotN, but with SF they didn't lie to us in the face, EotN is an insult.

Yes, i vote against EotN more than i vote for SF, and that's because EotN deserves it.